![]() ![]() ![]() military in determining the outcome of an American election. James McConville said in a joint statement: “There is no role for the U.S. In late December, the president’s former security adviser Michael Flynn suggested the act could also be employed to help overturn the election ( here) – but this was swiftly knocked back.Īrmy Secretary Ryan McCarthy and Chief of Staff Gen. The last time was in 1992 when the acquittal of four Los Angeles police officers in the beating of Black motorist Rodney King led to deadly riots. President Trump threatened on Monday to use federal forces to quell the protests and violence that have swept the country, a measure that legal experts said would. As an exception to the Posse Comitatus Act 1878, which prohibits military forces being used for domestic law enforcement, the 1807 act has been used in the past to quell civil unrest. 'It's not enshrined anywhere,' said Thaddeus Hoffmeister, a law professor at the. president to deploy the military to suppress domestic insurrection ( here, here ). The Insurrection Act is a law while 'martial law' is a concept that doesn't have a legal definition in the U.S. The Insurrection Act of 1807 allows the U.S. At the time of this article’s publication, there has been no confirmation from any official sources, including the relevant state departments, lawmakers, the military or the White House itself. It is being shared on accounts like and others ( here) citing unnamed “multiple sources” as confirmation. The claim about employing the Insurrection Act is also false. What was the Martial Law bill A measure that applied to all Ireland and was therefore unlike the. The official Trump campaign has had a Parler account since December 2018. Martial Law bill than the Insurrection act. There has been speculation about one being set up after Trump was banned from Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and others ( here, here, here ). 7 confirmed Trump had not created a personal Parler account. They show a misunderstanding of the law.Ī previous fact check from Reuters on Jan. president, nor are the claims about the invoking of the Insurrection Act accurate. The account on Parler, however, does not appear to be an authentic account from the U.S. For them, the threat of war or insurrection was sufficient to warrant martial law, and that it should be left to Congress to decide whether or not to employ it. The Parler platform has since been suspended ( here) But a screenshot of the post has subsequently been shared on other social networks ( here). Less than a week after receiving a presidential pardon for lying to the FBI, Mike Flynn is pushing a call for martial lawand drawing sharp denunciation from other retired senior military. I will remain president indefinitely until all domestic enemies are arrested.” These entities pose a direct threat to national security. It said: “I have invoked the Insurrection Act of 1807, to address the treasonous rebellion conducted by Democrat & Republican lawmakers, CCP agents, the FBI, DOJ, CIA & others to undermine, corrode and dismantle the United States of America and its constitution. The account, posted on the Parler social network, is written as though coming from the president himself. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |